Annotated bibliographies and rhetorical strategies

Consider these three examples of how the first sentences of an annotated bibliography can address a source’s use of rhetorical strategies:

  • Crucial to Spunk & Bite’s persuasiveness is Plotnik’s ethos as a friendly iconoclast, which he begins to establish with the title of his first chapter: “E.B. Whitewashed.”
  • A range of words that lend it academic credibility surround Helen Fein’s essay “Genocide by Attrition 1939-1993,” including “Harvard,” “PhD,” and an abstract in three languages. This probably increases the essay’s persuasive power for studious audiences.
  • The first chapter of John C. Bean’s Engaging Ideas begins with a rational for the book’s organization: “Teachers who are pressed for time can read this chapter and then . . . turn directly to the other chapters that address their most immediate concerns” (1-2). This direct appeal to his audience, indicating an awareness of their needs and respect for their autonomy, very likely persuades them to read on.

This entry was posted in Writing tools (non-fiction). Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s