The conventions of literary fiction

I’ve mentioned Robert Boswell’s excellent The Half-Known World: On Writing Fiction here before. One of his essays includes this paragraph:

This could be material at the heart of a literary story. It makes the events the result of motivated action rather than contrived coincidence. It makes the relationships among the characters multifaceted. It substitutes familial connections for celebrity. It moves the center of the story away from the surface event and into the inner life of the main character. Rather than blithely ridicule the woman, the story would attempt to investigate the real and gnarly interplay among familial loyalty, good intentions, malevolence, racial fear, and sexual politics. Not that it would attempt this by means of a calculated journey through each issue; rather, it would engage these subjects through the investigation of this character’s complex responses.

While the conventions of some genres are usually very obvious (crime fiction, for example, is crime fiction because it includes, you know, crime), the conventions of the genre of literary fiction are often less obvious. Boswell’s paragraph usefully describes those conventions, which can be helpful for writers trying to create examples of that genre.

Notice as well, from Benjamin Percy’s outstanding Thrill Me, this description of literary fiction:

Sentences were now more than vehicles for information; I pleasured in the arrangement of their words and read them aloud as if they were songs. Structures did not march forward with a chronological doggedness; they were cyclical or modular or framed or even arranged backward. Characters didn’t act purely in the service of plot; they flirted their way into digressions, lingered in conversations and on windowsills, and in doing so became more than puppets, but as alive as anyone I knew.

Percy argues persuasively for using the best strategies of both literary and genre fiction.

Posted in Writing tools | Leave a comment

Franklin as text

•What models does Franklin encounter? How do they influence him?

•What texts did Franklin find compelling? Why? “Texts” might include behaviors.

•List differences between Franklin’s values and those of the people around him. List commonalities.

•How does Franklin understand the world? How does that understanding change? Why does it change?

•When and by what is Franklin constrained? When and by what does he gain mobility?

•How does Franklin use the larger social structures around him? How does he function within them? When is he at odds with them?

Posted in American literature | Leave a comment

Character (three sets of prompts)

Characterization Techniques

(three sets of prompts)

To begin developing a character, answer these questions.

  1. What does the character look like? Describe him or her.
  2. Where was the character born? What was his or her upbringing like?
  3. What do the character’s parents or guardians do for a living? What is their attitude toward what they do?
  4. How many brothers or sisters? What are they doing now?
  5. About what does he or she feel the most guilt?
  6. What level and kind of education does the character have?
  7. What does the character do well? What does the character do for money?
  8. What are the character’s friends like? Why do they get along?
  9. What are the character’s hobbies?
  10. What is he or she most afraid of? Why?
  11. What does the character do to relax?
  12. How does he or she dress?
  13. What are the character’s religious beliefs?
  14. How does he or she feel about authority?
  15. What is the best thing that has happened to the character? The worse?
  16. What does he or she wish to do for the rest of his or her life? Why?
  17. What is the character’s strongest trait? Weakest?
  18. What does the character think is funny?
  19. What does the character think of him or her self?
  20. How is the character described by other people?

This next exercise comes from Metro: Journeys in Writing Creatively by Hans Ostrom, Wendy Bishop, and Katharine Haake.

Answer these questions about one character. You must write the answers out, but write quickly and authoritatively. Don’t worry about contradictions between answers: they can be sorted out or used later. Answering the questions quickly and spontaneously is important.

  1. What is the exact age of your character—years, months, and days?
  2. A place where you character is living or visiting begins to burn. The character has a few moments to escape. What does he or she grab before getting out of the fire? Why?
  3. The character enters the room in which you’re sitting. Sits down next to you, places his or her left hand on a table or desk near you. Look at the hand. Describe it in as much detail and you can. Quickly.
  4. You walk into a room in which your character is napping. Without waking the character up, you lean down, put your nose close to one side of your character’s neck—just below the ear there—and sniff. Describe what you smell.
  5. Describe one meal or food your character really likes to eat.
  6. Describe the social, political, and economic background of one of the character’s parents, one of the character’s siblings, one of the character’s friends, or one of the character’s rivals (defining “rival” in a way the makes most sense to you).
  7. Describe one scar—it can be a very tiny one—on your character’s body and how it was acquired.
  8. Describe in detail one thing your character would enjoy reading, or some kind of text your character would enjoy examining—a text that might exist with the text of your story.
  9. Your character laughs at something. What is it? Exactly why does your character think this thing—joke, event, sight, whatever—is funny?
  10. You are invisible; your presence is unknown by your character. You are observing your character looking into a mirror. Describe your observations.
  11. “France.” Your character hears that word. What, if anything, come to the character’s mind? Be as specific as you can.
  12. “I remember . . . “ Your character says or thinks these words. Now provide a list of at least five things your character remembers.
  13. Describe one not-so-obvious, not–so-easily detected nervous habit of your character. Toe-tapping and drumming-of-fingers-on-table are probably too obvious, too conventional, for example.
  14. A sound that is especially pleasing to your character—what is it? Why is it so pleasing to the character?
  15. What is your character’s middle name, and what is the brief history—if any—of that name?
  16. Describe (compare, contrast) the way is which your character sneezes in private and in public.
  17. Who is the first American President of which your character was aware, and what is one image or memory your character has of this President?
  18. Describe a piece of jewelry your character might wear or buy for another person or admire or dislike. (It’s all right to answer all four options, too.)
  19. List three things your character wants. Why?
  20. Provide one more telling piece of information about your character.

Finally, this exercise:

A story is a complete dramatic action—and in good stories, the characters are shown through the action and the action is controlled through the characters, and the result of this is meaning that derives from the whole presented experience. I myself prefer to say that a story is a dramatic event that involves a person because he is a person, and a particular person—that is, because he shares in the general human condition and in some specific human situation. The story always involves, in a dramatic way, the mystery of personality. . . . Fiction operates through the senses, and I think one reason that people find it so difficult to write stories is that they forget how much time and patience is required to convince through the senses. No reader who doesn’t actually experience, who isn’t made to feel, the story is going to believe anything that the fiction writer merely tells him. The first and most obvious characteristic of fiction is that it deals with reality through what can be seen, heard, smelt, tasted, and touched.

–Flannery O’Connor, “Writing Short Stories”

Characterize using

  • Particular sensory details
  • Contrasts
    • How might your character contradict him or her self? To which aspects of his or her own personality is he or she blind?
    • How is the villain of your story heroic? How is the hero villainous?
  • Change
    • How will your character be changed by the events of the story?
  • Actions
    • What sorts of things would your character do to accomplish his or her goals?
    • What would your character never do, even if that action would allow them to reach his or her goal?
  • Appearance
    • What general idea do you want the reader to have?
    • What sensory details will present it?
  • Speech
    • How might the character’s desire indirectly show itself in the character’s speech?
    • How might the character’s responses to the speech of others characterize him or her?
  • Thoughts
    • How might a character’s thoughts contrast with his or her speech, appearance, and actions?
  • Reactions of other characters
    • What do the actions of other characters tell readers about the main character?
    • How do the main character’s interpretations of the actions of other characters characterize him or her?
Posted in Writing tools | Leave a comment

English 2010.026

I may be a little late today.

Posted in More than you want to know | Leave a comment

Found freewriting

Revise this material into a poem. Remember that revision often includes the addition of new material and the cutting of old. Consider revising toward a formal poem or recall the characteristics of free verse.

We will try this at least for today.. I’ll k\need it later in the semester, like tommmarow or the next day, but not today. I can do it, yes I can. I could blame my parents. Easy targets. I don’t think I saw them kiss until I was like twenty one, but my other brother he got it on. I don’t know I don’t know I don’t know. This semester could go quickly or it could be a lot of work or it could be both. I am hoping for the good news, but then aren’t we all. I wonder what will happen to me. I think I need to practice my typing along with every thing else that I am tring to do. I will try and write forever. To you. Is it a good idea for us to be doing this?, when the opportunity cost is this high for both oth us. What to do. What to say what to be. get it done, some thing having to do, or ending in earth, in a sink hole in disruction that way maybe a fire or some other disaster. The thinG that is debilitating in the worry about money I find. I will be so glad if things work out with Chuck I don’t know when or if I woll be getting bake to so much. Back to so much. I have so much to go back to. The only paradises are the ones in our past. If you’ve got to ask, its too much. The glass isn’t half empty and it isn’t half full, its more than I can afford. Can it be? Praise be. Praise being. Not Being, Not Dasin. Not Datsun (do they still make those?) the Disney version, so candy coated. Chocking  on the sugar. There are these brownies at my house. They are very good.

Posted in Writing tools | Leave a comment

Definitions of rhetoric

  • “’Rhetoric’ has come down to us today simply as high-flown, windy and empty talk. It had a completely different meaning to the Greeks. Rhetoric was a crucially important technical discovery of the way language actually works and can be manipulated: ‘What is it that makes language so persuasive to us?’ Rhetoric was the investigation of this question, related to logic and the foundation of semiotics (in Greek, the ‘study of signs’) that we still use today” (Robinson and Groves, Introducing Plato 157).
  • “Rhetoric: the use of language as a symbolic means of inducing cooperation in beings that by nature respond to symbols. . . . the basic function of rhetoric [is] the use of words by human agents to form attitudes or to induce actions in other human agents” (Burke, A Rhetoric of Motives 43 & 41).
  • “Rhetoric is a form of reasoning about probabilities, based on assumptions people share as members of a community” (Lindemann).
  • “In short, rhetoric is a mode of altering reality, not by the direct application of energy to objects, but by the creation of discourse which changes reality through the mediation of thought and action” (Bitzer, The Rhetorical Situation).
  • “The faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion” (Aristotle, Rhetoric 181).
  • “Rhetoric, taken as a whole, is an art of influencing the soul through words, not merely in the law courts and all other public meeting places, but in private gatherings also” (Plato, Phaedrus 48).
Posted in Writing tools (non-fiction) | Leave a comment

Robert Hass on Edward Taylor

Two quotations from Hass’ “Edward Taylor: What Was He Up To?” in the March/April 2002 issue of The American Poetry Review:

The term baroque was introduced into critical discourse about art by the German scholar Heinrich Wolfflin. He used it to describe the difference between what he saw as the harmonies of the high Renaissance and what came after. “The Baroque,” he observed, “never offers us perfection and fulfillment, or the static calm of ‘being,’ only the unrest of change and the tension of transience.” It was this, perhaps, that the form of the meditative lyric allowed Taylor both to explore and to fend off, just as the worldly specifics in his poems, the processes of brewing and baking and metallurgy, the unguents, and powders and medicines, the children’s’ games and gambling games, allowed him to celebrate a world he was bound in conscience to deplore. (51)

Might Greenblatt see Taylor’s exploration and fending off of the baroque as an example of mobility and constraint? Where did the baroque come from for Taylor? Are there examples in the Preparatory Meditations of Taylor using the “form of the meditative lyric” as this kind of tool for exploring and fending off?

From the same essay by Hass,

So this was a Puritan minster in the 1680s on the remotest American frontier writing an often ecstatic poetry in a style strongly reminiscent of George Herbert but verging on a continental, Roman Catholic baroque, a minister who also, it should be added, was the author of a number of virulently anti-Papist works. The Puritans of Boston recognized the baroque style when they saw it. Michael Wigglesworth, the author of New England’s most popular poem, Day of Doom, sternly rebuked a poetry made of  “strained metaphors, far-fetch’t allusions, audacious & lofty expressions . . . meer ostentation of learning & empty flashes of a flourishing wit,” declaring that such writers “daub over their speech with rhetorical paintments” and “winding, crocked, periphrasticall circumlocutions & dark Allegoric mysteries.” This tells us that there was something un-Protestant about this adamantly Calvinist cleric. (43)

Given how little known Taylor’s work was during his lifetime, who exactly was Wigglesworth rebuking? Were his remarks public enough that Taylor would have been aware of them? Did he seem to feel constrained by his peer’s attitudes toward language? Why not? Finally, is the baroque in Taylor an example of transculturation? What examples from Taylor and Herbert (or other similar writers and writings) might support or refute this idea?

Posted in American literature | Leave a comment

Becoming Puritan

Edmund S. Morgan’s Visible Saints: The History of a Puritan Idea is one good place discover the process Puritans expected from each other as they started and joined congregations and took communion. This process has its own history, of course, including various forms of dissent.

Posted in American literature | Leave a comment

Changes to the MLA documentation system

The online writing lab at Purdue University summarizes the most important changes this way:

  • No More Underlining! Underlining is no more. MLA now recommends italicizing titles of independently published works (books, periodicals, films, etc).
  • No More URLs! While website entries will still include authors, article names, and website names, when available, MLA no longer requires URLs. Writers are, however, encouraged to provide a URL if the citation information does not lead readers to easily find the source.
  • Continuous Pagination? Who Cares? You no longer have to worry about whether scholarly publications employ continuous pagination or not. For all such entries, both volume and issue numbers are required, regardless of pagination.
  • Publication Medium. Every entry receives a medium of publication marker. Most entries will be listed as Print or Web, but other possibilities include Performance, DVD, or TV. Most of these markers will appear at the end of entries; however, markers for Web sources are followed by the date of access.
  • New Abbreviations. Many web source entries now require a publisher name, a date of publication, and/or page numbers. When no publisher name appears on the website, write N.p. for no publisher given. When sites omit a date of publication, write n.d. for no date. For online journals that appear only online (no print version) or on databases that do not provide pagination, write n. pag. for no pagination.

Some examples can be found by scrolling down here. “Son of Citation Machine” seems to have kept up with these changes, but be sure to use the correct documentation system and the correct type of source.

Posted in Writing tools (non-fiction) | Leave a comment

English 3510 readings . . .

will be posted in links to the right, by title. I may group them together as the semester continues. The first is “The Cultural Dynamics of American Puritanism” by David M. Robinson.

Posted in American literature | Leave a comment